Marriage
Part 6 Pastoral Applications
Chapter 66 Internal Forum Solution
or
"Good Conscience Solution"
The following pages were given to me by a priest who was helping a couple in
the parish some years ago and he wanted me to know what he had told them. I have
since learned from a reader of this webpage that they are derived from a letter
from Bishop Bernard J. Ganter, Bishop of Beaumont, Texas. It was written on
October 17, 1978. I have not yet written him for permission to reprint them
here, but I am in the process of doing so.
[Return to top of this page]
[Return to top of this page]
[Return to top of this page]
Chapter seven of the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, "Lumen
Gentium," Vatican II, reminds us that the Church "will attain her full
perfection only in the glory of heaven", until that time she is a pilgrim
people, dwelling in exile, with a genuine though imperfect holiness and with a
justice which takes on the appearance of this passing world. Because the Church
is visible and social she functions, in part, through visible laws, social
systems, and concrete procedures - designed to yield justice and avoid
arbitrariness yet none of which are exempt from the weaknesses of human
existence, namely, error, ignorance, honest mistakes, lack of information,
indifference, fear and sadly, even ill will. Even those fountains of God's
invisible transcendent life - the sacraments - are visible and subject to
frustration for reasons all too human.
It is in this pilgrim context that I share with you my constant concern for
those persons who have divorced and are now in second marriages. I speak not
only of fellow Catholics who are of the Household of Faith but also of
non-Catholics who now are drawn to the Catholic Church through the example of a
Catholic spouse - faithful though unable to receive the Eucharist and their
children whose Catholic education has often been powerfully supported by the
non-Catholic parent.
Until the present time, innumerable persons who are convinced that they have
grounds for an annulment of their first marriages have been unable to obtain
one. The reasons why annulments have not been granted are multiple and sometimes
lie with the parties themselves who may not wish to open to strangers the deep
wounds of earlier years or who may not wish to endure the unseemly delay in
Tribunal procedure; sometimes with overworked parish priests who are unfairly
expected to be experts in law, theology and liturgy and who simple cannot,
without the assistance of dedicated laity, search out the lost sheep; and
sometimes with the Tribunal itself because its priests are expected to be
experts in the law, psychiatry, family life, theology, and pastoral ministry.
But perhaps the most frequent reason why an annulment is not obtained is
because the invalidity of the first marriage cannot be proven in the manner
prescribed by canonical and juridical procedure. The following information is
presented for your instruction and encouragement in healing the hearts of those
persons whose first unions are prudently evaluated in the internal forum to be
invalid but proof is unobtainable.
[Return to top of this page]
What an "Internal Forum Solution" is NOT
It is not a validation by a priest of a second marriage while the
spouse of the first marriage is still alive.It is not a permission for a previously married person, whose
spouse is still living, to remarry in the Catholic Church.
It is not permission for a priest to perform any kind of public or
private ceremony which has the appearance of a marriage ceremony, validation,
or blessing.It is not a judicial procedure but simply a pastoral decision made
in accord with recognized moral and canonical principles that a divorced
person who has attempted remarriage (and/or his second spouse) may use the
sacraments of Reconciliation and Eucharist, if feasible without scandal.
It is not a substitute for, or by-pass of, external forum solutions
of the Tribunal.What an "Internal Forum Solution" IS
It is a pastoral judgment made by the proper ecclesiastical minister, in the
internal forum, that a person involved in a second marriage (while the first
spouse is still alive) has, by reason of a properly formed conscience, the right
to receive the sacraments, with no canonical decision being rendered by the
Tribunal as to the validity or invalidity of the previous marriage or previous
marriages.
Definitions
Pastoral judgment: it is a decision made by the pastor or associate
pastor, or an equally appropriate priest, without recourse to the Tribunal.Internal forum: it is a decision reached in private counseling with
the parties in the present marriage: For the sake of thoroughness it should
not be done during the few minutes available in the Sacrament of
Reconciliation. At least several sessions of in-depth counseling and
investigation should be involved; it is never to be rushed nor is it to be
readily assumed that the parties understand the full implications of a good
conscience solution. As an aid in gathering the facts, the priest could use
the "Petitioner's Testimony Form" (as used for formal cases); he could ask the
questions on that form of the party, and ask further questions of his own
devising if the party's answers are not clear. After the investigation is
complete the priest should destroy the form.
Properly formed conscience: it is the task of the priest to assure
that the party seeking the good conscience solution understands the difference
between an annulment (i.e., a bond never existed from the beginning) and a
divorce (i.e., a bond acknowledged by the State to exist is severed by the
authority of the State); that the Catholic Church does not recognize the right
of any authority to sever a consummated sacramental marriage bond and hence
the party's obligation to establish that his/her previous marriage was null
from the beginning.With no canonical decision being rendered by the Tribunal: the
Tribunal is by its very nature obliged to follow canonical procedure and
judicial precedence; hence, "good conscience" or internal forum solutions are
not its proper jurisdiction. If the parish priest has questions concerning the
internal forum solution, he is invited to call the Tribunal personnel for
assistance or to consult with any other priest in the diocese who may be
experienced in such pastoral judgments
[Return to top of this page]
1. The remarried party and the parish priest are personally convinced
of the invalidity of the previous marriages, though unable to offer proof in the
external forum because
a. no witnesses are available to substantiate the
alleged ground; forum because:
b. knowledgeable witnesses will not cooperate;
c. the first spouse's testimony is needed for proof but
not obtainable;
d. Medical records or other necessary documents are not
obtainable.
2. The remarried party (and the present spouse if Catholic) can receive
the sacraments without causing scandal or adverse criticism in the Faith
community.
3. The remarried party promises to have the present marriage validated
in the event of the death of the first spouse.
4. The remarried party and the present spouse are fulfilling the
responsibilities of Christian marriage in the present union, especially
fidelity, parenthood, and a genuine sharing of conjugal life and love.
5. The Catholic party or couple in the present marriage must have
practiced the Catholic Faith insofar as possible since entering this irregular
union and must be raising any children born of this union in the Catholic Faith.
6. The Catholic party or couple in the present marriage must agree to
receive the sacraments in churches where their irregular union is unknown if
this is the only way scandal can be avoided.
7. The couple in the present marriage must understand that an internal
forum solution, based on good conscience, implies no change in Catholic teaching
on the Sacrament of Matrimony; that it provides no public approval of their
union by the Church; that no entry of their present marriage can be made in the
Matrimonial Register of the parish and no certificate of marriage can be issued
for their present union. They must be willing to live with this lack of external
Church approval which does not, of course imply disapproval of their return to
sacramental life based on a good conscience solution.
Conclusion:
All of us know that many good people have left the Church entirely, many stay
affiliated to the Church as nominal Catholics, and still many struggle to do the
best they can as partners in a second marriage when it has not been possible to
secure a decree of nullity for an apparently invalid prior marriage. I would
urge you to seek out these suffering souls, use the above norms if applicable
and make available the loving mercy of the Lord through the Sacrament of
Reconciliation and the spiritual nourishment and strength of the Eucharist.
[Further information can be found in Michael Lawler, Marriage and
Sacrament: A Theology of Christian Marriage (The Liturgical Press: Michael
Glazier)].
[Return to top of this page]
[Return to top of this page]
© Copyright: Tom Richstatter, Franciscan Province
of St. John the Baptist, Cincinnati Ohio, Order of Friars Minor. All Rights
Reserved. This page was created by Fr. Thomas Richstatter, O.F.M.
Every effort has been, and is being made, to acknowledge sources when the ideas
are not my own. Any failure to comply with the United States Copyright Act
(Title 17, United States Code) will be corrected immediately should I become
aware of it. This site was updated on
06/05/07 . Your comments on this site are
welcome at
webmaster2@tomrichstatter.org.
|